Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hornady Transportation, LLC v. Fluellen

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided October 26, 2012No. 2100939Published

1DissentPittman, Judge

I respectfully dissent because I do not believe that the dependents satisfied their burden of proving, by a preponderance of the evidence, see Aa.Code 1975, § 25-5-81(c), that the cause of Charles Fluellen’s death was “thermal injuries due to a motor-vehicle incident with fire.”

Hornady Transportation, LLC, objected to the admission of Dr. Samuel Simmons’s cause-of-death opinion (and the two official documents derived from that opinion) on two grounds: that they were based on hearsay statements in the EMS report and that they were inconsistent with the undisputed facts of the case. The trial…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Southern Ry. Co. v. DicksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  2. Southworth v. SheaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1901
  3. Ex Parte Diversey Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  4. Waters Bros. Contractors, Inc. v. WimberleyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2009
  5. Ex Parte Mobile Power and Light Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API