Legal Opinion

Crosland v. State

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 6, 1993No. 920481Published

1Opinion of the Court

857 P.2d 943 (1993)

Darwin Willard CROSLAND, Petitioner,

v.

STATE of Utah, Respondent.

No. 920481.

Supreme Court of Utah.

August 6, 1993.

Manny C. Garcia, Salt Lake City, for petitioner.

R. Paul Van Dam, Atty. Gen., Kris Leonard, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salt Lake City, for respondent.

DURHAM, Justice:

Petitioner Darwin Willard Crosland seeks a writ of mandamus to compel dismissal of the information filed against him in the First Circuit Court of Box Elder County. At issue is the proper interpretation of article III of the Interstate Agreement on Detainers ("IAD" or "Agreement").[1] Utah Code Ann. § 77-29-5…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. MauroSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Cuyler v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Fex v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Commonwealth v. MartensMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
  5. State v. StillingUtah Supreme Court · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API