Legal Opinion

Siderca S.A.I.C. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided August 26, 2005No. Consol. 01-00692PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

POGUE, Judge.

Plaintiffs, Siderca S.A.I.C. (“Siderca”), Dalmine S.p.A. (“Dalmine”), and NKK Tubes challenge the remand determination of Defendant, the U.S. International Trade Commission (“the ITC”), in the sunset review of antidumping orders on oil country tubular goods (“OCTG”) from Argentina, Italy, Japan, Korea, and Mexico. Plaintiffs allege that aspects of the ITC’s determination are not in accordance with law and unsupported by substantial record evidence.

BACKGROUND

In August of 1995, following the ITC’s finding that U.S. producers of OCTG were being materially injured by…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Wisconsin Department of Revenue v. William Wrigley, Jr., Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Wieland Werke, AG v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1989
  4. Alcan Aluminum Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
  5. BIC Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Nucor Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2008
  2. Pastificio Lucio Garofalo, S.P.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2011
  3. Wieland Werke, AG v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007
  4. Globe Metallurgical, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2008
  5. Siderca S.A.I.C. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API