Legal Opinion

United States Fire Ins. Co. of New York v. Rayburn

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 5, 1938No. 28201PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHurst, J.

This is an action for damages for breach of contract to insure. Judgment was rendered for plaintiff, and defendants appeal. The facts are as follows:

March 9, 1934, plaintiff, a school teacher, purchased an automobile from defendant Kohler Chevrolet Company. Plaintiff made a down payment, and agreed to pay the balance; on the installment plan in 16 equal monthly payments beginning April J. 1934. The notes evidencing the payments were made lajrble to the defendant Security Finance Company, which was to handle the deferred payments. Defendant Dial was president and owner of the Security Finance…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Massachusetts Bonding Ins. Co. v. VanceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  2. Commercial Casualty Ins. Co. v. ConnelleeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ohio Casualty Ins. v. CallawayCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1943
  2. Glens Falls Insurance Company v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  3. Prudential Fire Ins. Co. v. StanleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  4. Phillis Development Co. v. Commercial Standard Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
  5. Traders and General Insurance Co. v. AbelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API