Legal Opinion

State v. Leonard

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided April 12, 1988No. 5646PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorcott, J.

The defendant appeals from the judgment of conviction rendered following the denial of his motion to suppress all evidence seized at the scene of his arrest. After the trial court denied the motion, the defendant, pursuant to General Statutes § 54-94U,1 *135entered a conditional plea of nolo contendere to the charge of possession of narcotics (cocaine) with intent to sell in violation of General Statutes § 21a-277 (a). The sole dispositive issue on appeal is whether it was proper for the trial court to have denied the defendant’s motion to suppress evidence based on an unreasonable search and…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Texas v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. LongoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  2. State v. ThomasConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
  3. State v. LeonardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  4. State v. BryantConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
  5. State v. KendrickConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API