Legal Opinion
State v. Bryant
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 5, 1989No. 7262PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFoti, J.
The defendant appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after he had entered a conditional plea of nolo contendere to an amended information, of possession of cocaine with intent to sell by a person who is not drug-dependent in violation of General Statutes § 21a-278 (b).1 The defendant claims that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress. We find no error.
At the hearing on the motion to suppress, the court heard testimony from the defendant and the arresting police officer, Randy Gerovitz, and found the following facts. At approximately 11 p.m. on November 11, 1987,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Pennsylvania v. MimmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- New York v. ClassSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- State v. GrahamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- State v. FedericiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. FlippoWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. SailorConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- State v. GrilloConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
- State v. HolmesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- State v. BryantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.