Legal Opinion

Mandujano v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)

Decided July 15, 1998No. 03-96-00443-CRPublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BEA ANN SMITH, Justice.

A jury found appellant guilty of delivery of marihuana and the trial court sentenced him to forty-four years’ confinement. 1 Appellant’s sole point of error is a Batson challenge. We must decide whether the prosecutor offered a race-neutral basis for challenging a Hispanic potential juror, and, if so, whether the trial court’s decision to accept the prosecutor’s explanation should be sustained. We find the trial court’s ruling was not clearly erroneous and will affirm the conviction.

Trial Procedures and Standard of Review for Batson Challenges

Appellant contends the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Hernandez v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Purkett v. ElemSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Vargas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  5. Wheatfall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Bausley v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1999
  2. Christopher Wardlow v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1999
  3. Craig v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2002
  4. McKenna v. W & W SERVICES, INC., Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2009
  5. Bobby Coleman v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2001

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API