Legal Opinion
Vargas v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Decided June 24, 1992No. 1507-89PublishedCited by 188 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
BENAVIDES, Judge.
A jury convicted appellant of unlawful delivery of a controlled substance. The court found two enhancement paragraphs true and assessed punishment at confinement for thirty-five (35) years. The Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction. Vargas v. State, 781 S.W.2d 356 (Tex.App.— Houston [1st] 1989). We granted appellant’s petition for discretionary review to consider whether the State’s use of its peremptory challenges violated appellant’s right of due process under Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Hernandez v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Keeton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by188 opinions
- Watkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2008
- Ross v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
- Ramirez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1998
- Reed v. QuartermanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
- Emerson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
183 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.