Legal Opinion

Tarazi v. Truehope Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided July 24, 2013No. 13 Civ. 1024(LAK)(JCF)PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDÉR

JAMES C. FRANCIS IV, United States Magistrate Judge.

Defendants Truehope Inc. (“Truehope”), Open Mind Consulting (“Open Mind”), Dana Ray and Autumn Stringam (togeth*431er, “the Stringams”), and Quintessential Bioseiences, LLC (“Q Sciences”) move to stay this action in deference to an earlier-filed action in the Court of Queen’s Bench of Alberta, Canada. For the reasons that follow, the defendants’ motion is granted. Background

This dispute centers on a series of agreements. The first, a Marketing and Distributorship Agreement, was executed on one side by Truehope, a Canadian…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  4. Quackenbush v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Royal & Sun Alliance Insurance Co. of Canada v. Century International Arms, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. C.D.S., Inc. v. ZetlerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
  2. NovaSparks SA v. EnyxFPGADistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
  3. Rapid Pharmaceuticals AG v. KachrooDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2015
  4. Acuren Inspection, Inc. v. AboyounDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2019
  5. Alcazar Capital Partners Company v. Kurdistan Regional Government of IraqDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2024

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API