Legal Opinion

United States v. Harvey W. Van Fossan

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided April 9, 1990No. 89-3102PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge.

This case is for the birds: migratory birds, protected by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, 16 U.S.C. §§ 703-11. Springfield’s city fathers concluded that too many pigeons were congregating at a vacant lot near Harvey Van Fossan s home, and they told him to get rid of them. He did, first by shooting them and then, to take care of the nimble ones, by spreading corn and wheat suffused with strychnine. Two common grackles and two mourning doves arrived and learned that there ain’t no such thing as a free lunch. Their bodies were found nearby and shipped to the Smithsonian…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. FeolaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. United States v. ParkSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. United States v. EnglerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
  4. United States v. Joseph ForcellatiCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
  5. United States v. Janet Leslie Cooper ByrnesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. In Re Extradition of Curtis Andrew Howard. United States of America v. Curtis Andrew HowardCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  2. United States v. Samuel H. SouthCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  3. United States v. Kenneth A. KozelCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  4. Mahler v. United States Forest ServiceDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1996
  5. United States v. CITGO Petroleum CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API