Legal Opinion
Burns v. Architectural Doors and Windows
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided May 24, 2011No. Docket: Pen-10-81PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSaufley, C.J.
[¶ 1] Craig Burns was injured when an overhead garage door struck him on the head at his place of employment. His product liability claim against the installer of the door resulted in a judgment against him entered in the Superior Court (Penob-scot County, Murphy, J.) following a jury’s determination that the installer was not liable to Burns. Burns challenges, among other matters, the court’s limitations on his ability to argue certain causes of action during trial. Finding no error, we affirm the judgment.
I. BACKGROUND
A. Circumstances of Burns’s Injury
[¶ 2] The following facts are taken…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Champagne v. Mid-Maine Medical CenterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
- Bernier v. Raymark Industries, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1986
- Lorfano v. Dura Stone Steps, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1990
- Koken v. Black & Veatch Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- Marois v. Paper Converting MacHine Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Dana Desjardins v. Michael ReynoldsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017
- Janet Howe v. MMG Insurance CompanySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014
- InfoBridge, LLC v. Chimani, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2020
- Vitorino America v. Sunspray Condominium AssociationSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2013
- Delanna Garey v. Stanford Management, LLCSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2024
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.