Legal Opinion

Marois v. Paper Converting MacHine Co.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided February 18, 1988PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NICHOLS, Justice.

The Defendant, Paper Converting Machine Company, appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court (Kennebec County) entered upon a jury verdict, finding the Defendant liable for personal injuries sustained by the Plaintiff, Michael Marois, an employee of Statler Tissue Company, Augusta, while operating a paper rewinder manufactured by the Defendant. The Defendant contends that the Superior Court erred when it: (1) determined that there was sufficient evidence to allow the jury to find that the Defendant’s machine was the proximate cause of the injury; (2) instructed the jury…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Michalko v. Cooke Color & Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  2. Adams v. Buffalo Forge Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
  3. Wing v. MorseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1973
  4. Michaud v. SteckinoSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
  5. Stanley v. Schiavi Mobile Homes, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. William and Rita ESPEAIGNNETTE, Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. GENE TIERNEY COMPANY, INC., Defendant, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
  2. Hall v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  3. Anderson v. Hannaford Bros. Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
  4. Piper v. Bear Medical Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
  5. prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 14,989 Christopher Moulton v. The Rival CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API