Legal Opinion

McConnell v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 16, 1980No. Appeal, No. 2020 C.D. 1978PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Mencer,

In this unemployment compensation appeal, Matthew McConnell (claimant) asks us to reconsider the decision in Oravec Unemployment Compensation Case, 171 Pa. Superior Ct. 491, 90 A.2d 269 (1952), wherein the Pennsylvania Superior Court held that a determination of eligibility by the Office of Employment Security (Office) which is not appealed is not conclusive as to the employer on the issue of eligibility for subsequent benefit years for which the claimant makes application,1 despite the fact that the eligibility question rests on the same set of circumstances. We find,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Safeguard Mutual Insurance v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Callery v. Blythe Township Municipal AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  3. Lentz v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Oravec Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  5. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. EspositoCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lamborn v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Chandler v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Osborne v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API