Legal Opinion

Lentz v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 26, 1979No. Appeal, No. 731 C.D. 1978PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Craig,

In this unemployment compensation case, claimant was discharged for excessive absenteeism and the local office of the Bureau of Employment Security (Bureau) approved benefits on June 27, 1975. Within the allotted time, the employer, Phoenix Clothes, a division of Genesco, Inc. located in Allentown, sent to the Bureau’s local office a petition for appeal from its decision. The signature and address of appellant was designated as “Phoenix Clothes by: Reed, Roberts Associates, Inc., 650 Smithfield St., Suite 920, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.”

The central finding of fact in the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mihelic v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Flynn Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  3. Berry v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review of Commonwealth v. FerraroCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Oravec Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. unempl.ins.rep. Cch 22,077 Harry T. Edmundson v. Borough of Kennett Square Robert F. Goddu Kenneth Roberts Herbert L. Waltz Albert J. McCarthyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  2. Carroll v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Zinicola v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Kuna v. UN. COMP. BD. OF REV.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Shimko v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API