Legal Opinion
Howard v. Farmers Insurance
Court of Appeals of Kansas
Decided November 14, 1980No. 50,938PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Meyer, J.:
This case involves a dispute over subrogation rights to personal injury protection (PIP) benefits. It was submitted to the court for summary judgment on the following uncontroverted facts.
On January 18, 1973, the Farmers Insurance Company, Inc. (appellee) issued its policy to Jerry Howard, the appellant’s husband. The policy contained PIP benefits. It was last reissued on July 18, 1977, extending coverage to January 18, 1978.
On August 22, 1977, the named insured, appellant’s husband, died as a result of injuries sustained in an automobile collision.
Appellee paid $2,960.00 in PIP…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Dunn v. JonesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936
- Easom v. Farmers Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1977
- Nitchals v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1979
- Brown v. Combined Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1979
- American Fidelity Insurance v. Employers Mutual Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1979
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Schmick v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1985
- Eidemiller v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1997
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co. v. BriggsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1990
- Elliott v. Farm Bureau Ins. Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.