Graham v. Lambeth
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Gernon, J.:
In this appeal of a quiet title action, Paul M. Lambeth, appellant, claims that a sheriff’s deed acquired after a tax foreclosure sale conveys a new and paramount title extinguishing all prior interests.
William J. Graham, appellee, contends he acquired the disputed land by adverse possession and, therefore, the district court did not have jurisdiction of the land and any sale for taxes was void.
The parties submitted the case on an agreed statement of facts pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 3.05 (1995 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 21).
Graham purchased a tract of land from Rosenquist in 1964. Both…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Harrison v. EverettSupreme Court of Colorado · 1957
- Jensen Livestock Co. v. Custer CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1942
- Foreclosure of Tax Liens Pursuant to Section 75.521 Wisconsin Statutes by Waukesha County v. YoungWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
- Leciejewski v. SedlakWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
- Van Doren v. WolfSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Chesbro v. Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2008
- Crone v. NussCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2011
- PANGAEA EXPLORATION CORP. v. RylandCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2010
- Hewitt v. Kirk's Remodeling & Custom Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2013