State v. Standifer
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Knudson, J.:
Inman Standifer appeals from the district court’s denial of his motion to convert sentence ostensibly filed pursuant to K.S.A. 21-4724(d)(l). The district court summarily dismissed Standifer’s motion for lack of jurisdiction because it was not filed within 30 days after issuance of a sentencing guidelines report from the Department of Corrections (DOC).
The district court erred. A panel of this court recently held that a pro se motion for conversion of sentence filed out of time under K.S.A. 21-4724(d)(l) should be considered by the district court as a motion filed under K.S.A.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- James Robert McQueary v. James Blodgett, Superintendent, Wsp Corrections, Dept of Indeterminate Sentencing Review BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Chiles v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
- State v. FierroSupreme Court of Kansas · 1995
- State v. BellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1995
- State v. RandallSupreme Court of Kansas · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. GaudinaSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
- State v. AnthonySupreme Court of Kansas · 2002
- State v. McCarthyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- State v. McCarthyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- Fanning v. StateCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1998