Legal Opinion

State v. Standifer

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided October 10, 1997No. 77,050PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Knudson, J.:

Inman Standifer appeals from the district court’s denial of his motion to convert sentence ostensibly filed pursuant to K.S.A. 21-4724(d)(l). The district court summarily dismissed Standifer’s motion for lack of jurisdiction because it was not filed within 30 days after issuance of a sentencing guidelines report from the Department of Corrections (DOC).

The district court erred. A panel of this court recently held that a pro se motion for conversion of sentence filed out of time under K.S.A. 21-4724(d)(l) should be considered by the district court as a motion filed under K.S.A.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. James Robert McQueary v. James Blodgett, Superintendent, Wsp Corrections, Dept of Indeterminate Sentencing Review BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  2. Chiles v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
  3. State v. FierroSupreme Court of Kansas · 1995
  4. State v. BellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1995
  5. State v. RandallSupreme Court of Kansas · 1995

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. GaudinaSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  2. State v. AnthonySupreme Court of Kansas · 2002
  3. State v. McCarthyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  4. State v. McCarthyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  5. Fanning v. StateCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API