Legal Opinion

State v. McCarthy

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 3, 2002No. 47819-2-IPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

Following Dennis McCarthy’s conviction for delivery of heroin, a dispute arose as to whether his prior conviction for solicitation to deliver heroin should count as one or three points in his offender score. The sentencing court scored the offense as one point, rejecting the State’s argument that our decision in State v. Howell1 controlled. The State appeals, arguing that the scoring conflicts with Howell. We reverse and remand for .resentencing.

FACTS

McCarthy pleaded guilty to delivery of heroin. At sentencing, the parties disagreed on how to score his prior conviction for solicitation to…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. State v. ManussierWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. CoriaWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  3. James Robert McQueary v. James Blodgett, Superintendent, Wsp Corrections, Dept of Indeterminate Sentencing Review BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  4. Sperry & Hutchinson Co. v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  5. In re the Personal Restraint of HopkinsWashington Supreme Court · 1999

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. RossWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State v. RossWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Rivard v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Rivard v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  5. In re the Personal Restraint of HegneyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API