Innovair Aviation, Ltd. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION and ORDER
SMITH, Senior Judge.
The Court has before it the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment on the matter of liability for the alleged taking of Plaintiffs property without just compensation and for an illegal exaction. With its cross-motion, the Defendant filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs illegal exaction claim for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. For the reasons set forth below, the Court holds that the Government took Plaintiffs property without just compensation. Because the Court finds an uncompensated taking, it does not reach the Plaintiffs illegal exaction…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Innovair Aviation Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Innovair Aviation, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Innovair Aviation, Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007