Jackson v. Ore Navigation Corp.
District Court, D. Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
THOMSEN, Chief Judge.
Libelant asks leave to dismiss this suit in admiralty without prejudice, upon payment of costs, so that he may proceed with a civil action he has recently filed in the Southern District of New York. His motion, opposed by respondent, is based upon two grounds: (a) that his original proctors, Hillman and Hillman, had no authority to file this suit in admiralty; and (b) if they had, this court should exercise its discretion to permit him to dismiss without prejudice, so that he may have a jury trial in the jurisdiction he has finally chosen. In effect, though not in form,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Doucette v. VincentCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1952
- The Confiscation CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- McCarthy v. American Eastern CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949
- Balado v. Lykes Bros. S.S. Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
- Evelyn McAfoos and William Neff v. The Canadian Pacific Steamships, Ltd., and the Canadian Pacific Railway Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Shell Oil Co. v. S.S. TynemouthDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1962
- McLaughlin v. Blidberg Rothchild Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1958