Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Ore Navigation Corp.

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided March 11, 1958No. 3905PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMSEN, Chief Judge.

Libelant asks leave to dismiss this suit in admiralty without prejudice, upon payment of costs, so that he may proceed with a civil action he has recently filed in the Southern District of New York. His motion, opposed by respondent, is based upon two grounds: (a) that his original proctors, Hillman and Hillman, had no authority to file this suit in admiralty; and (b) if they had, this court should exercise its discretion to permit him to dismiss without prejudice, so that he may have a jury trial in the jurisdiction he has finally chosen. In effect, though not in form,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Doucette v. VincentCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1952
  2. The Confiscation CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  3. McCarthy v. American Eastern CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949
  4. Balado v. Lykes Bros. S.S. Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
  5. Evelyn McAfoos and William Neff v. The Canadian Pacific Steamships, Ltd., and the Canadian Pacific Railway Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Shell Oil Co. v. S.S. TynemouthDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1962
  2. McLaughlin v. Blidberg Rothchild Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API