Legal Opinion
McLaughlin v. Blidberg Rothchild Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 24, 1958PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FREDERICK van PELT BRYAN, District Judge.
A suit in admiralty and a civil action at law, both for the alleged wrongful death of a seaman, have been consolidated for trial pursuant to Rule 42(a), F.R.C.P., 28 U.S.C.A. The opinion directing-consolidation (McLaughlin v. Blidberg Rothchild Co., D.C.S.D.N.Y., 156 F.Supp. 379, Id., D.C., 156 F.Supp. 381) fully state the facts and it is unnecessary to detail them here.
The present motion concerns only the causes of action asserted against respondent and defendant Blidberg Rothchild. Blidberg now moves to strike a jury demand made by plaintiff in the *34ac…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Evelyn McAfoos and William Neff v. The Canadian Pacific Steamships, Ltd., and the Canadian Pacific Railway Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
- Mason v. British Overseas Airways Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1957
- Jackson v. Ore Navigation Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1958
- McLaughlin v. Blidberg Rothchild Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1957
- McLaughlin v. Blidberg Rothchild Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1957
3Cited by2 opinions
- Patterson v. Maher ex rel. MaherWyoming Supreme Court · 1969
- Lemelson v. Gerber Products Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1966