Legal Opinion

Shell Oil Co. v. S.S. Tynemouth

District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Decided November 9, 1962No. 5152PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ELLIS, District Judge.

Libellant, Shell Oil Company, moves this Court to reconsider its decision in Shell Oil Company v. S/S Tynemouth, E.D.La., 205 F.Supp. 838, in which this •Court granted a summary judgment in favor of respondent on the grounds that, on the undisputed facts, libellant had no •cause of action.

While libellant does not dispute the holding that it has no cause of action recognized at general law, it asserts that "LSA-Civil Code, Article 2703, gives it a cause of action. This state codal provision gives a lessee a cause of action against a third party (not asserting a claim to…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Southern Pacific Company v. JensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. Robins Dry Dock & Repair Co. v. DahlSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  5. Evelyn McAfoos and William Neff v. The Canadian Pacific Steamships, Ltd., and the Canadian Pacific Railway Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Federal Commerce & Navigation Co. v. the M/V MarathonianDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1975
  2. Rockaway Blvd. Wrecking & Lumber Co. v. Raylite Electric Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
  3. Francese v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API