Legal Opinion
Bandle v. Commercial Bank of Los Angeles
California Supreme Court
Decided July 19, 1918No. L. A. No. 4526. Department OnePublishedCited by 22 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
The plaintiff sued to quiet her title to two lots of land situated in Los Angeles County, against the claims of the defendant. The plaintiff derived her title to the land by deeds from her husband, Charles W. Bandle, executed on January 24, 1911.
The claim of the defendant to the land is based on a sheriff’s deed under an execution sale upon a judgment in favor of the defendant against said Charles W. Bandle, the husband, entered in the superior court of the county on January 16, 1912, and on the contention that the deed by him to the plaintiff on January 24, 1911, was fraudulent and void as…
2Cited by22 opinions
- See v. North American Accident InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Jessup Farms v. BaldwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- Buckhantz v. R. G. Hamilton & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1945
- Arques v. National Superior Co.California Court of Appeal · 1945
- Reiss v. ReissCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.