Legal Opinion

Robert Hixon Lumber Co. v. Rowe

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 15, 1925No. 12,092PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRemy, C. J.

On September 1, 1918, appellees Marion, Walter and Mabel Cramer, being the owners as tenants in common of certain real estate, entered into a contract with appellee Rowe by the terms of which they sold to him the real estate, placing him in possession, but retaining title in themselves until the consideration was fully paid; it being agreed that a stipulated sum should be paid each year for a period of ten years, and that if Rowe failed to make any payment when due, his rights under the contract would be lost, and the Cramers could take possession of the real estate, and treat the payments…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People's Savings, Loan & Building Ass'n v. SpearsIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Holland v. FarrierIndiana Court of Appeals · 1921
  3. Toner v. WhybrewIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
  4. Rusche v. PittmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1904
  5. Davis v. ElliottIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Woods v. DECKELBAUMIndiana Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Courtney v. LuceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1936
  3. DALLAS COMPANY, INC. v. William Tobias Studio, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. Granite Improvement Co. v. O'HaverIndiana Court of Appeals · 1927
  5. National Brick Co. v. RussellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API