Toner v. Whybrew
Indiana Court of Appeals
Prom Pulton Circuit Court; Harry Bernetha, Judge. Action by Albert D. Toner against Walter Wbybrew and others. Prom a judgment for plaintiff against defendant Whybrew and in favor of his co-defendants, the plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtHottel, J.
— Appellant brought this action against appellee Whybrew to foreclose a materialman’s lien. Joseph Musselman and Anna Musselman, his wife, were made parties to the action to answer as to any interest which they might claim in the property in question and are the active appellees in this appeal. They also filed a cross-complaint, asking that title to the property be quieted in them.
The cause was tried by the court, which rendered a general finding, and found for appellant as against appellee Whybrew, and rendered personal judgment against said Whybrew, but on the cross-complaint, found that…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Potter Manufacturing Co. v. A. B. Meyer & Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1909
- Neeley v. SearightIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- Kansas City Hotel Co. v. SauerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1877
- People's Savings, Loan & Building Ass'n v. SpearsIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- Clark v. HueyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Haimbaugh Landscaping, Inc. v. JegenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
- Holland v. FarrierIndiana Court of Appeals · 1921
- Woods v. DECKELBAUMIndiana Supreme Court · 1963
- City of Evansville v. Verplank Concrete & Supply, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1980
- Courtney v. LuceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1936
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.