Legal Opinion

National Brick Co. v. Russell

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 7, 1934No. 14,657PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDudine, J.

This action was originally instituted by appellees Clare B. Russell and Sadie Russell, husband and wife, as a suit to quiet title. In the course of the litigation they dismissed their complaint. It will serve no good purpose to discuss the complaint.

Before the complaint was dismissed, appellant National Brick Company, appellee William Seliger, doing business as Seliger Electric Company, and appellee Beckman Supply Company each filed separate cross-complaints to foreclose mechanic’s liens.

Appellant’s and appellee Seliger’s cross-complaints were each in two paragraphs. Hearings were had on…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Holland v. FarrierIndiana Court of Appeals · 1921
  2. Rader v. A. J. Barrett Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  3. Toner v. WhybrewIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
  4. Better Homes Co. v. Hildebrand Hardware Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Robert Hixon Lumber Co. v. RoweIndiana Court of Appeals · 1925

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. American Islam Society, Inc. v. Bob Ulrich Decorating Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1956
  2. DALLAS COMPANY, INC. v. William Tobias Studio, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. Abrams v. SilverIndiana Court of Appeals · 1936
  4. Snelling v. Wortman, Rec.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API