State ex rel. Helm v. Trego County Cooperative Telephone Co.
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Dawson, J.:
This is an original proceeding in mandamus to compel the defendants to restore a telephone service heretofore furnished to the public by them and which they have discontinued without the consent of the public utilities commission.
It appears that for some years past one of these defendants, The WaKeeney Telephone Company, was conducting a public telephone business in and about WaKeeney. It built or acquired a line running *702twelve or fifteen miles south of WaKeeney. The Farmers Mutual Telephone Company of Ransom was originally a mutual…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- State ex rel. Caster v. Kansas Postal-Telegraph-Cable Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1915
- Custer v. RoyseSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
- Peters v. Farmers State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
- State ex rel. Caster v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1918
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Board of Public Utilities v. Kansas City Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1934
- Oklahoma-Arkansas Telephone Co. v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
- Kansas Gas v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. ReedSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
- State ex rel. Public Service Commission v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1928
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.