Legal Opinion
Bassick Mfg. Co. v. Adams Grease Gun Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 30, 1928PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THACHEK, District Judge.
These patents have been so often adjudged valid that it may well be said that the point has been reached, if not already passed, where the concordance of opinion sustaining them has become a controlling authority. Mast, Foos & Co. v. Stover Mfg. Co., 177 U. S. 485, 20 S. Ct. 708, 44 L. Ed. 856. Finding no reason to believe that the many decisions which have already been rendered upon full considera*723tion are wrong, little need be said on tbe question of validity. The plaintiff’s title to the patents in suit has been questioned, but this question was, I believe, rightly…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mast, Foos & Co. v. Stover Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Leeds & Catlin Company v. Victor Talking Machine Company (No. 2)Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Minerals Separation, Ltd. v. Butte & Superior Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Traitel Marble Co. v. U. T. Hungerford Brass & Copper Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
- Lyman Mfg. Co. v. Bassick Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1927
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bassick Mfg. Co. v. Adams Grease Gun CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
- Jacob Elishewitz & Sons Co. v. Bronston Bros. & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
- Alemite Corporation v. Lubrair CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1933