Legal Opinion

Alemite Corporation v. Lubrair Corporation

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided January 31, 1933No. 2710PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORTON, Circuit Judge.

This is a suit for contributory infringement of patent No. 1,307,734 to Gullborg for lubricating means dated June 24,1919. Only two claims are in suit, Nos. 14 and 15. In the District Court the plaintiff moved for a temporary injunction on a record made up of ex parte affidavits filed by both sides, and various patents, drawings, and documents relating to the art. The District Judge denied the motion, and the plaintiff appealed from the refusal to grant the injunction. Judicial Code § 129 (28 USCA § 227).

The objects of the invention are stated to be “to provide novel…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Shively v. BowlbySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. United Shoe MacHinery Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. Carbice Corp. of America v. American Patents Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. Morgan Envelope Co. v. Albany Perforated Wrapping Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
  5. Leeds & Catlin Co. v. Victor Talking MacHine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. B. B. Chemical Co. v. EllisCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1941
  2. R. M. Hollingshead Co. v. Bassick Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1934
  3. Garry W. Todd v. Sears, Roebuck and CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1954
  4. B. B. Chemical Co. v. EllisDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1940
  5. Bauer Patent Corp. v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1961

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API