Legal Opinion

Holt v. Nesbit

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 5, 1985PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Special Term properly ruled that the negligence of the driver of plaintiff’s vehicle shall not bar plaintiff’s recovery, but erred in holding that the driver’s negligence “may to the extent proved at trial be asserted in diminution of the plaintiff Holt’s award of damages.”

The general rule is that a driver’s negligence should not be imputed to an absentee owner so as to bar or diminish the owner’s recovery for property damage (see, Kalechman v Drew Auto Rental, 33 NY2d 397; Continental Auto Lease Corp. v Campbell, 19 NY2d 350). The defendants’ contention, apparently adopted by Special Term,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Continental Auto Lease Corp. v. CampbellNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
  2. Kalechman v. Drew Auto Rental, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1973
  3. State v. PoprickiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  4. Smalley v. Associated Transport, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  5. Bibergal v. McCormickCivil Court of the City of New York · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Servidori v. MahoneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  2. Mikelinich v. CaliandroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API