Legal Opinion

Mikelinich v. Caliandro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 5, 2011PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Chambers, J.

The sole issue on this appeal is whether the owner of an all-terrain vehicle is barred under Vehicle and Traffic Law § 2411 from recovering damages for personal injuries to himself and damage to his property based on the alleged negligence of a permissive driver of that vehicle. We answer this question in the negative.

Factual Background

The plaintiff, Christopher Mikelinich, alleges that on May 3, 2008, he was hit by an all-terrain vehicle (hereinafter the ATV) owned by him1 and driven by the defendant Nicholas Caliandro, allegedly injuring the plaintiff and…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Morris v. Snappy Car Rental, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Gochee v. WagnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  3. Murdza v. ZimmermanNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. Plath v. JustusNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. Continental Auto Lease Corp. v. CampbellNew York Court of Appeals · 1967

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Maniscalco v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  2. MONETTE, ROBERT K. v. TRUMMER, CHRISTINA L.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  3. Aparicio v. Uber Technologies Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2023
  4. Lawry v. LawryNew York Supreme Court · 2012
  5. MONETTE, ROBERT K. v. TRUMMER, CHRISTINA L.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API