Legal Opinion

Bibergal v. McCormick

Civil Court of the City of New York

Decided November 20, 1979PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Gloria Goldstein, J.

This automobile negligence action for property damage resulting from a two-car collision presents an old issue which must be reconsidered in light of Kalechman v Drew Auto Rental (33 NY2d 397) and its progeny. Is the negligence of an employee-operator, while driving within the scope of his em*796ployment, imputed to his employer-owner in the employer-owner’s action for property damage?

In a trial by the court in which the plaintiff appeared pro se the following facts were determined: Paul Bibergal is the son and employee of the plaintiff. He is not a party…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Gochee v. WagnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  2. Mills v. GabrielNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  3. Continental Auto Lease Corp. v. CampbellNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
  4. Kalechman v. Drew Auto Rental, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. Nagele-Kelly Manufacturing Co. v. HannakMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. PoprickiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  2. Mikelinich v. CaliandroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. Holt v. NesbitAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API