Legal Opinion

Richard Abernathy v. Southern California Edison

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 5, 1989No. 88-15105PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:

For over fifty years, the lower federal courts have been required to apply the interlocutory appeal doctrine known as the Eneloui-Ettelson rule to orders denying or granting stays pending arbitration and orders compelling arbitration. Although the courts of every circuit have displayed open hostility to the rule, 1 we have faithfully, if unhappily, applied the dictates of the Supreme Court and allowed parties dissatisfied with a district court’s interlocutory order to appeal. 2 One of the consequences of this rule has been that arbitrations, favored because of their…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Gulfstream Aerospace Corp. v. Mayacamas Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. John C. McGuckin v. Dr. Smith John C. Medlen, Dr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  2. Wakefield v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  3. Jagdishbhai and Hansaben Patel v. Del Taco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  4. Negrete v. Allianz Life Insurance Co. of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  5. Duane Nordin v. Nutri/system, Inc., a Pennsylvania CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API