Sanchez v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court 1
OPINION
2Opinion of the Court · KellerKeller, J.
McCORMICK, P.J., and MEYERS, MANSFIELD, PRICE, HOLLAND, JOHNSON and KEASLER, JJ., joined.
Appellant was convicted under the “sexual harassment” provision of the official oppression statute. See TEX. PEN. CODE § 39.03(a)(3).1 Relying in large part upon Long v. State, 931 S.W.2d 285 (Tex.Crim.App.1996), he argued to the Court of Appeals that this provision is unconstitutionally vague on its face and as applied to his conduct. The Court of Ap*680peals sustained these contentions, finding that the sexual harassment provision is (1) unconstitutionally vague on its face and as applied in…
3Cases cited23 opinions
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by87 opinions
- Sanchez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006
- Ripkowski v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001
- Sanchez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
- Sims, Christian VernonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2019
- Elite Auto Body LLC v. Autocraft Bodywerks, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2017
82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.