Legal Opinion

Jenkins v. Dahnert

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 19, 1962No. Civ. 20111PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDraper, P. J.

Plaintiffs are husband and wife. In separate actions which were consolidated for trial, they sought damages for personal injuries sustained in an automobile accident. A jury awarded $4,000 to the husband and $203 to the wife. Although represented by counsel at trial, each appeals in propria persona. No motion for new trial was made. The sole issue raised on appeal is the claimed inadequacy of the damages awarded.

The amount to be awarded in a case of this type is' a question of fact. Thus it is to be determined by the jury in the first instance, and reviewed by the court on motion for new…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gersick v. ShillingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  2. Alexander v. McDonaldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  3. Gimbel v. LaramieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. Bate v. JolinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Morseman v. MangumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Glendale Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Marina View Heights Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1977
  2. Schroeder v. Auto Driveaway Co.California Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Morris v. FrudenfeldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  4. Sholar v. BarkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. Carter v. Agricultural Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API