Legal Opinion

Gulf, West Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 16, 1904PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Bee. Tried below before Hon. H James C. Wilson. 1

1Opinion of the Court

NEILL, Associate Justice.

This is a second appeal in this case. The opinion of this court on the former is published in 65 S. W. Rep., 83. As a statement of the nature of the case is given there, it is unnecessary for us to repeat it here. The judgment now appealed from was entered upon a verdict in favor of the appellee for $750. The questions of law raised on this appeal are substantially the same as were presented and disposed of in the other. As we have no reason to change our views as to the principles of law applicable to the case as then expressed, we will without reiteration, but in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. HannigTexas Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Klatt v. N. C. Foster Lumber Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Holt v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Southern Pacific Co. v. WellingtonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1901

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Drake v. San Antonio & Aransas Pass Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Wichita Falls & S. R. v. LindleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  3. Price v. Consumers' Cotton Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1905
  4. Kirby Lumber Co. v. HardyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  5. Ringer v. St. Louis & San Francisco RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API