Legal Opinion

LRS Electric Controls, Inc. v. Hamre Construction Inc.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 2005No. 75096-3PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*734¶1 The central question presented is whether preclaim notice requirements, generally necessary to recover on a materials claim against either a contractor’s bond (RCW 39.08.065) or a retained percentage (RCW 60.28.015), apply to second-tier subcontractors supplying both materials and labor to a public works project. We are also asked to determine whether payments received by a second-tier subcontractor are deemed to apply pro rata between the labor and the materials portions of a contract where the materials portion is barred. Upon motions for summary judgment, the superior court concluded…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Jones v. Allstate InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Jones v. Allstate Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Western Telepage, Inc. v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Western Telepage, Inc. v. City of Tacoma Department of FinancingWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Bravo v. Dolsen CompaniesWashington Supreme Court · 1995

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. AllianceOne Receivables Management, Inc. v. LewisWashington Supreme Court · 2014
  2. LRS Electric Controls, Inc. v. Hamre Const., Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Williams v. Athletic Field, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  4. Williams v. Athletic Field, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  5. Campbell Crane & Rigging Services, Inc. v. Dynamic International AK, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2008

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API