Legal Opinion

Ford v. Parker

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided September 28, 1943No. 2629PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHESNUT, District Judge.

This is a proceeding to set aside an order of the Deputy Commissioner, United States Employees’ Compensation Commission, requiring the complainant Ford as employer, to pay $1,000 into the special fund created by section 44(c) (1) of the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act, 33 U.S.C.A. § 901 et seq.

The facts are briefly and succinctly stated by the Deputy Commissioner as a result of hearing at which the employer, Ford, was represented by experienced counsel, and no additional evidence has been submitted here.

On July 4,1942 the tanker “S. S. Esso Augusta”…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Aguilar v. Standard Oil Co. of NJSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Davis v. Department of Labor and Industries of Wash.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Grant Smith-Porter Ship Co. v. RohdeSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  5. O'Donnell v. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs v. Perini North River AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Pennsylvania Railroad v. O'RourkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. Thibodeaux v. J. Ray McDermott & Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
  4. Paul Romero Reyes v. Marine Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1974
  5. Johnson v. TraynorDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1965

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API