Legal Opinion
Ralston v. Morgan
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided November 16, 1937No. Civil No. 3856PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.
This is an action commenced and prosecuted by J. F. Ralston to recover $3,246.15 in money which he claims came into the hands of O’Sullivan, Morgan & Bunte as his attorneys in some litigation by plaintiff against the United Verde Mining Company and the United Verde Extension Mining Company, corporations.
The amended complaint purports to set out four causes of action. The first is for $1500 alleged to have been advanced by plaintiff to defendants “as a retainer and as an advance” against defendants’ fee and to be deducted therefrom. The second is for an alleged wrongful overcharge of $1,746.15…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Volkening v. . DegraafNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- McCarthy v. Mount Tecarte Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
- Loventhal & Son v. MorrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
- Chittenden & Eastman Co. v. Leader Furniture Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1921
- Little v. BrownArizona Supreme Court · 1930
3Cited by8 opinions
- Builders Supply Corporation v. MarshallArizona Supreme Court · 1960
- Wakeham v. Omega Construction CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1964
- Perbal v. Dazor Manufacturing Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1968
- Ara Inc. v. City of GlendaleDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2019
- Newbery Corporation Newbery Electric, Inc., Plaintiffs-Counter-Defendants-Appellants, and Citibank (Arizona), Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellant v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Company the American Insurance Company National Surety Corp. Associated Indemnity Corporation American Automobile Insurance Co., Defendants-Counter-Claimants-Appellees. Newbery Corporation Newbery Electric, Inc. v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Company the American Insurance Company National Surety Corp. Associated Indemnity Corporation American Automobile Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.