Legal Opinion

State v. Stout

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 4, 1887No. 12,640PublishedCited by 8 opinions

From the Monroe Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

The offence for which the appellee was prosecuted is thus charged in the information : “The said Florence Stout did then and there unlawfully frequent and live in a certain house of ill-fame, to wit, the house of James Stout, on Third street, in the city, of Bloomington, State and county aforesaid, and did then and there unlawfully associate with women of bad character for chastity, to wit, Martha Mershon, Jane Releford. and Emma J. Young, in public places then and there situate, to wit, on the public walks of said city of Bloomington, and at houses which men of bad character frequent and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fahnestock v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Davis v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Marshall v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  2. State v. FidlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Douglass v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1897
  4. State v. SarlinIndiana Supreme Court · 1919
  5. State v. SchipperIndiana Supreme Court · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API