Legal Opinion

State v. Sarlin

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1919No. 23,521PublishedCited by 7 opinions

From Randolph. Circuit Court; Theodore Shockney, Judge. Prosecution by the State of Indiana against Chañes Sarlin. From adjudgment for the defendant, the state appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, J.

— Appellee was charged, under §8356d Burns’ Supp. 1918, §4 of chapter 4 of Acts 1917 p. 15, with unlawfully keeping six pints of whisky with the intent to dispose of the same in violation of this section.

The trial court sustained appellee’s motion to quash the affidavit, and the state appeals. So much of the affidavit as is necessary is as follows: “Did then and there unlawfully keep and have in his possession intoxicating liquor, to wit: six (6) pints of whiskey, with the intent to sell, barter, exchange, give away, furnish or otherwise dispose of the same or use within the State of Indiana,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fahnestock v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Davis v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Yazel v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Regadanz v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
  5. State v. ParisIndiana Supreme Court · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Rowe v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Jenkins v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Randolph v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1928
  4. James v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Graves v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1921

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API