Legal Opinion
Meaders v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided December 30, 1986No. 84-822PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TERRY, Associate Judge:
Appellant appeals from his conviction of rape, in violation of D.C. Code § 22-2801 (1981). On appeal he contends that the trial court erred in refusing to admit into evidence portions of a written statement allegedly made by the victim to a defense investigator which contained comments about the victim’s prior sexual relations with men; in prohibiting cross-examination of the victim about her prior sexual conduct with other men; and in refusing to admit a medical examination form describing the physical condition of the victim shortly after the rape. We reject all of…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Alford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Springer v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
- William J. Gass v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
- United States v. Oscar Ordonez, German Hernandez Garcia, AKA Jaime RiveraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Itel Capital Corporation, a Corporation, Cross-Appellant v. Cups Coal Company, Incorporated, a Corporation and Herman Mulvehill, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Roundtree v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Davis v. WinfieldDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- Battle v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- Brewer v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- Gardner v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.