State v. Manzo
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT BY
KID WELL, J.
Appellant was charged, in the district court, that he “knowing its contents and character did disseminate for monetary consideration pornographic materials, to wit, an 8 mm movie film entitled “Dog Instruktio”, thereby committing the offense of Promoting Pornography, in violation of Section 1214(l)(a) of the Hawaii Penal Code.”
After Appellant’s demand for a jury trial, the cause was transferred to the circuit court, where Appellant moved to dismiss. The circuit court denied the motion and allowed an interlocutory appeal. Appellant claims that the statute…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Dombrowski v. PfisterSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Baehr v. LewinHawaii Supreme Court · 1993
- Cammack v. WaiheeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Crosby v. State of Hawai'i Department of Budget & FinanceHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. KamHawaii Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. HuelsmanHawaii Supreme Court · 1978
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.