Pullen v. Seaboard Trading Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the plaintiffs, Hugh Charles George Pullen and another, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 29th day of September, 1914, denying their motion to strike out certain paragraphs of the amended answer as irrelevant and redundant.
1Opinion of the Court
Laughlin, J.:
This is an action on a judgment alleged to have been duly recovered by plaintiffs against defendant in a court of general jurisdiction in Brazil, in an action commenced by process of summons duly issued and served upon the defendant by presenting and delivering the summons to its secretary in Brazil.
The answer denies the material allegations of the complaint, and particularly the allegations with respect to service of process and the due commencement of the action in Brazil. It then pleads in separate defenses designated first and second, facts tending to show that there was and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Rodgers v. . ClementNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Smith v. . CoeNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- Thompson v. . WittkopNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
- Einstein v. EinsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
- Myers v. SteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- American Aniline Products, Inc. v. Mitsui & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
- Burnham v. HornadayNew York Supreme Court · 1927
- DeWitt v. New York Herald Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
- Dry Milk Co. v. Dairy Products Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
- De St. Aubin v. Paul Guenther, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1916
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.