Legal Opinion
Anam v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided February 17, 1988No. Appeal, No. 2542 C.D. 1986PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Senior Judge Narick,
Calleb Anam (Claimant) petitions this Court for review of a decision of the Workmens Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which denied Claimants request for rehearing and affirmed a referees decision denying Claimant workmens compensation benefits.
The somewhat confusing procedural history in this matter can be summarized as follows. On or about December 10, 1984'Claimant filed a petition for workmens compensation benefits pursuant to Section 108 of The Pennsylvania Workmens Compensation Act (Act), Act of June 2, 1915, P.L. 736, as amended, 77 P.S. §1208, alleging…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Kirkwood v. UN. COMP. BD. OF REV.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Andracki v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- McKenna v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania State Horse Racing CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Young v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Grubbs v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Umedman v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Society Hill Civic Ass'n v. Pennsylvania Gaming Control BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- City of Philadelphia v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Puhl v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- New Hope Academy Charter School v. School District of the City of YorkCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.