Legal Opinion

Society Hill Civic Ass'n v. Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 4, 2007No. 40 EM 2007PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam 1

This direct appeal pursuant to Section 1204 of the Pennsylvania Race Horse Development and Gaming Act (“Gaming Act”), 4 Pa.C.S. § 1204, was commenced in this Court by the filing of a petition for review of the February 1, 2007 order of the Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board (“Board”). Such order granted conditional licenses to Philadelphia Entertainment & Development Partners, L.P., d/b/a Foxwoods Casino (“PEDP”), and HSP Gaming, L.P. (“HSP”) for Category 2 slot machine licenses in the City of Philadelphia and denied the applications of three other applicants. Intervenor HSP (joined by…

Also in this document: Per curiam 2.

3Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Wm. Penn Parking Garage, Inc. v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. City of Philadelphia v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Pittsburgh Palisades Park, LLC v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. In Re HicksonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. Payne v. Commonwealth Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by34 opinions

  1. Johnson v. American StandardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  2. Capital Bluecross v. Pennsylvania Insurance DepartmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. SugarHouse HSP Gaming, L.P. v. Pennsylvania Gaming Control BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  4. Commonwealth, Department of Education v. Empowerment Board of ControlSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. Johnson v. American StandardSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API