Legal Opinion

Dileo v. Barreca

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 7, 2005PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*367In related actions to recover damages for personal injuries, (1) the plaintiffs in action No. 1, Velvet Dileo, Peter Dileo, and Marietta Esposito, appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Martin, J.), dated May 12, 2003, as denied their motion pursuant to CPLR 4404 to set aside a jury verdict in favor of the defendants Rosalie Barreca, Yevgeniy Dikler, and Svetlana Anuchina in action No. 1 on the issue of liability as against the weight of the evidence, (2) the plaintiffs in action No. 2, Svetlana Anuchina and Yevgeniy Dikler, appeal from so much of the same order…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Hallmark Cards, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Nicastro v. ParkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  3. Lolik v. Big v. Supermarkets, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Miller v. MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Batal v. Associated Universities, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Vainer v. DiSalvoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  2. Laino v. LuccheseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  3. Gergis v. MiccioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  4. McCain v. LarosaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  5. Hull v. SpagnoliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API