Legal Opinion

Kehlet v. Bergman

California Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 1912No. L.A. No. 2754PublishedCited by 10 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and from an order refusing a new trial. Charles Monroe, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

This action is to quiet title. It is brought by plaintiffs claiming under a tax title from the state against defendants, owners of the land at the time the assessment for which the property was sold became delinquent. Judgment passed for defendants and from that judgment and from the order denying their motion for a new trial plaintiffs appeal.

The notice contemplated by section 3897 of the Political Code was not mailed, the deeds reciting that the addresses of the owners were unknown. It is contended in support of the judgment that upon the authority of Smith v. Furlong, 160 Cal. 522, [117…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Best v. WohlfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Smith v. FurlongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Jacoby v. WolffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Andrews v. North Side Canal Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Healton v. MorrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Scott v. BeckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Krotzer v. DouglasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API