Legal Opinion

On Lee v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 21, 1952No. 543PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum filed by Mr. Justice Frankfurter with a statement by Mr. Justice Black.

Memorandum of

Mr. Justice Frankfurter.

The rule governing the filing of amici briefs clearly implies that such briefs should be allowed to come before the Court not merely on the Court’s exercise of judgment in each case. On the contrary, it presupposes that the Court may have the aid of such briefs if the parties consent. For the Solicitor General to withhold consent automatically in order to enable this Court to determine for itself the propriety of each application is to throw upon the Court a responsibility…

2Cited by22 opinions

  1. Paul Lessig v. Tidewater Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
  2. Karseal Corporation v. Richfield Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
  3. Walker Distributing Company v. Lucky Lager Brewing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
  4. H. W. Martens and Robert A. Maurin, Jr. v. Carl F. Barrett, B. C. Farcell and the Texas CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
  5. Richfield Oil Corporation v. Karseal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API