Legal Opinion
Richfield Oil Corporation v. Karseal Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 13, 1959No. 15514PublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES M. CARTER, District Judge.
This is an appeal from a judgment entered on a jury verdict in a private treble damage action under the anti-trust laws. It presents two questions, (1) the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict and judgment, (2) the correctness of instructions given the jury on the effect of a prior decree in a government anti-trust case.
There was originally presented a third question, the reasonableness of an allowance of $7,500 attorney’s fee based on the trebled judgment of $23,700. This point was abandoned by appellant Rich-field during the oral arguments on…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Palmer v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Bigelow v. RKO Radio Pictures, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Southern Photo Materials Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc. v. Hawaiian Oke & Liquors, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Paul Lessig v. Tidewater Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Sharon Hageman, Admx. Of the Estate of Donald Hageman v. Signal L. P. Gas, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1973
- Kenneth Lehrman v. Gulf Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Herman Schwabe, Inc. v. United Shoe MacHinery CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.